A new class-action lawsuit filed on October 27, 2025 in Jackson County, Missouri accuses Drake and streamer Adin Ross of promoting unlawful gambling through Stake’s U.S. sweepstakes site, Stake.us.
The complaint claims the stars glamorized high-stakes play to impressionable audiences, misled viewers about whose money was being wagered, and helped drive traffic to a platform the suit says violates Missouri law.
Both Drake and Ross were widely featured in gambling livestreams, and the filing seeks damages and an injunction. The defendants have not publicly responded at press time, and the allegations remain unproven in court.
What the Lawsuit Says
The lawsuit argues that Stake.us operates casino-style games in a way that breaches Missouri gambling rules. It describes the site’s “dual currency” model — players buy Gold Coins for entertainment and separately receive Sweeps Coins that can be redeemed for cash — as a structure designed to skirt traditional gambling regulations.
The suit further alleges deceptive marketing: that flashy streams by Drake and Adin Ross presented big wagers as their own while actually using “house money,” making any dramatic wins or losses part of a broader promotion.
According to the complaint, these streams encouraged viewers — including young fans — to sign up and spend more than they otherwise would have.
Lawyers for the plaintiff say the celebrity tie-ins were central to the platform’s growth, citing massive audiences and the cultural influence of both defendants.
By naming the endorsers alongside Stake.us, the case attempts to hold promoters accountable for allegedly misleading claims about risk, funding, and the legality of the gameplay. The filing asks the court to certify a class, award damages, and halt the practices described as “deceptive, fraudulent, and unfair.”
Representatives for Stake, Drake, and Ross either did not comment or could not be reached by publication, and no court has ruled on the merits yet.
Why This Matters for U.S. Sweepstakes Casinos
For readers tracking the U.S. sweepstakes casino space, this case could be a big moment. Sweepstakes casinos like Stake.us argue that their model — purchasing Gold Coins while receiving free Sweeps Coins with a chance to redeem prizes — is entertainment, not traditional gambling.
Regulators and plaintiffs in several states, however, have questioned whether these mechanics effectively mirror real-money gambling. A ruling in Missouri could influence how other states interpret the model, shaping whether platforms adjust their games, geoblocking, or marketing.
The lawsuit also puts a spotlight on influencer partnerships. Gambling streams have become a driver of sign-ups, with creators showcasing large bets, rapid-fire bonuses, and dramatic wins.
If a court finds that promotional streams blurred the line between marketing and authentic play — especially if house funds were used without clear disclosure — brands and creators may face stricter standards.
Expect more fine-print, clearer “paid partnership” labels, and possibly fewer high-dollar stunt bets presented as personal wagering.
Players in Missouri should know that nothing changes unless and until a court issues an order. The case could take time, be narrowed, settle, or be dismissed. Still, it’s a reminder to read terms carefully, understand how Sweeps Coins work, and watch for disclosures when celebrities or streamers showcase betting.
As always, remember that allegations are claims, not facts, until a judge or jury decides.
